Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Louise
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T10:07:14Z
dc.date.available2024-03-19T10:07:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2023en
dc.identifier.citationCarroll L, Gallagher L, Smith V, Pregnancy, birth and neonatal outcomes associated with reduced fetal movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised studies, Midwifery, 116, 103524, 2023, 1-15en
dc.identifier.issn0266-6138
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/107325
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractProblem: Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM) is identified as an important alarm signal for possible risk of impending adverse perinatal outcomes. Background: Perinatal outcomes associated with RFM are increasingly being investigated in non-randomised studies with several associated outcomes, including stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and neonatal death being reported. Findings from studies, however, are conflicting. Aim: To synthesise the findings of published studies regarding pregnancy, birth and neonatal outcomes in women who presented with RFM. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL complete, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, and Science Citation Index databases were searched up to 8th July 2021 and updated again on 8th September 2022. Non-randomised studies involving pregnant women ≥24 weeks' gestation, who presented with a primary complaint of RFM compared to women who did not present with RFM were included. Data were meta-analysed using a random-effects model and presented as Odds Ratios (OR) or Standard Mean Differences (SMD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Findings: Thirty-nine studies were included. Women with RFM had increased odds of stillbirth (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.02-5.88) and small for gestational age (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.61) when compared with women who did not have RFM. Associations were also found for induction of labor, instrumental birth and caesarean section but not for preterm birth (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.19) or neonatal death (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.52-1.90). Conclusion: This review revealed that RFM is associated with increased odds of stillbirth, small for gestational age, induction of labor, instrumental birth and caesarean section but not preterm birth or neonatal death.en
dc.format.extent1-15en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMidwifery;
dc.relation.ispartofseries116;
dc.relation.ispartofseries103524;
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectMeta-analysis; Pregnancy outcomes; Reduced fetal movements; Stillbirth; Systematic reviewen
dc.titlePregnancy, birth and neonatal outcomes associated with reduced fetal movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised studiesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/gallaglo
dc.identifier.rssinternalid250956
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103524
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDTagHealth outcomesen
dc.subject.TCDTagMaternity Careen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0001-9915-0516
dc.subject.darat_impairmentOtheren
dc.subject.darat_thematicHealthen
dc.status.accessibleNen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record