Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurray, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-15T15:25:33Z
dc.date.available2011-08-15T15:25:33Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationMurray, Peter. 'Educational developmentalists divided? Patrick Cannon, Patrick Hillery and the economics of education in the early 1960s'. - Economic & Social Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, Autumn, 2010, pp. 325?348, Dublin: Economic & Social Research Institute
dc.identifier.issn0012-9984
dc.identifier.otherJEL I25
dc.identifier.otherJEL I28
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/58665
dc.description.abstractThe catalytic effect of the OECD-linked study that produced Investment in Education is a much celebrated episode of Ireland?s modernisation. A remarkably broad cross-departmental consensus supported the initiative. Bureaucratic caution and ministerial self-preservation were set aside to allow a ?warts and all? portrait of Irish education to be painted by the study team. Special efforts were made to focus public attention on the findings of a damning report that legitimated a quickening pace of government action to increase access to an expanded, rationalised and reoriented education system. But, as well as developmentalist triumph over conservatism in the education field, there was also significant division between state and civil society developmentalists. This is examined through an analysis of the relationship between the Federation of Lay Catholic Secondary Schools and the Department of Education.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEconomic & Social Studies
dc.relation.ispartofVol.XX, No. XX, Issue, Year
dc.sourceEconomic & Social Reviewen
dc.subjectEducation policyen
dc.subjectEconomics of educationen
dc.subjectIrelanden
dc.titleEducational developmentalists divided? Patrick Cannon, Patrick Hillery and the economics of education in the early 1960s
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.publisher.placeDublinen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record