Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichards, Derek
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-11T08:58:04Z
dc.date.available2021-04-11T08:58:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021en
dc.identifier.citationFranklin, M., Enrique, A., Palacios, J., Richards, D., Psychometric assessment of EQ-5D-5L and ReQoL measures in patients with anxiety and depression: construct validity and responsiveness, Quality of Life Research, 2021 Apr 9:1–15en
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/96019
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Generic health measures have been questioned for quantifying mental-health-related outcomes. In patients with anxiety and/or depression, our aim is to assess the psychometric properties of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L (generic health) and ReQoL-UI (recovery-focussed quality of life) for economic evaluation against the PHQ-9 (depression) and GAD-7 (anxiety). EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression item and ReQoL-10 are also assessed. Methods: A 2:1 (intervention: control) randomised controlled trial collected measures at baseline and 8 weeks post baseline; in the intervention arm, data were also collected 3, 6, 9, and 12-months post baseline. EQ-5D-5L preference-based scores were obtained from the value set for England (VSE) and 'cross-walked' EQ-5D-3L United Kingdom (UK) value set scores. ReQoL-UI preference-based scores were obtained from its UK value set as applied to seven ReQoL-10 items. EQ-5D-5L and ReQoL measures' construct validity and responsiveness were assessed compared against PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores and group cut-offs. Results: 361 people were randomised to intervention (241) or control (120). ReQoL-UI/-10 had better construct validity with depression severity than the EQ-5D-5L (VSE/cross-walk scores), which had relatively better construct validity with anxiety severity than the ReQoL-UI/-10. Across all intervention-arm time-points relative to baseline, responsiveness was generally better for EQ-5D-5L (VSE in particular) than ReQoL-UI, but worse than ReQoL-10. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to recommend the ReQoL-UI over EQ-5D-5L for economic evaluations to capture anxiety severity. However, there may be rationale for recommending the ReQoL-UI over the EQ-5D-5L to capture depression severity given its better construct validity, albeit poorer responsiveness, and if recovery-focussed quality of life relative to condition-specific symptomology is the construct of interest.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQuality of Life Research;
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectAnxietyen
dc.subjectDepressionen
dc.subjectEQ-5D-5Len
dc.subjectEconomic evaluationen
dc.subjectPsychometricsen
dc.subjectReQoL-10en
dc.subjectReQoL-UIen
dc.titlePsychometric assessment of EQ-5D-5L and ReQoL measures in patients with anxiety and depression: construct validity and responsivenessen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/drichard
dc.identifier.rssinternalid226954
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02833-1
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0003-0871-4078
dc.subject.darat_thematicHealthen
dc.status.accessibleNen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record