Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFleming, Neilen
dc.contributor.authorMahony, Nicholasen
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T16:34:23Z
dc.date.available2022-02-22T16:34:23Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.date.submitted2022en
dc.identifier.citationBoland, M., Crotty, N., Mahony, N., Donne, B., Fleming, N., A Comparison of Physiological Response to Incremental Testing on Stationary and Dynamic Rowing Ergometers., International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 17, 4, 2022, 515 - 522en
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/98153
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of the current study was to compare responses to graded exercise testing (GXT) on 2 popular commercial rowing ergometers. Methods: A cohort of 23 subelite male rowers (age 20 [2] y, height 1.88 [0.06] m, body mass 82.0 [8.8] kg) performed a GXT on both stationary (Concept2 [C2]) and dynamic (RowPerfect3 [RP3]) rowing ergometers. Physiological responses including oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (BLa), stroke rate (SR), and minute ventilation (VE) were recorded. BLa data were plotted graphically and anaerobic threshold was identified using the Dmax method. Workload, HR, and VO2 at Dmax were interpolated. Physiological responses at maximal exercise and at Dmax were compared, along with response across a discrete range of submaximal workloads. Results: At maximal exercise, no significant differences in HR, VO2, or BLa were observed (P > .05); however, VEpeak was significantly higher during RP3 tests (T = 2.943, P < .05). No significant differences in HR, VO2, or BLa at Dmax were observed (P > .05). When comparing across submaximal workloads, HR was significantly higher with the RP3 at 2 distinct workloads (210 and 240 W; P < .05), while SR was higher during RP3 testing at all workloads (F = 56.7, P < .05). When SR was fixed as a covariate, the effect of ergometer on HR response was not significant. A significant workload by ergometer interaction effect was observed for SR with higher data recorded on the RP3 (F = 3.48, P < .01). Levels of agreement for GXT-derived measures of anaerobic threshold (Dmax) were deemed unacceptable. Conclusions: These results indicate that while some differences in HR and VE response were observed between ergometers, these differences were a result of SR alterations between ergometer type. While no differences in response at Dmax were observed, the poor levels of agreement between ergometers suggests that prescription of GXT-derived threshold for training should ideally be specific to the rowing ergometer upon which the test was performed.en
dc.format.extent515en
dc.format.extent522en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performanceen
dc.relation.ispartofseries17en
dc.relation.ispartofseries4en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectExercise physiologyen
dc.subjectHeart rateen
dc.subjectLactateen
dc.subjectOxygen uptakeen
dc.subjectRowing ergometryen
dc.titleA Comparison of Physiological Response to Incremental Testing on Stationary and Dynamic Rowing Ergometers.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/nfleminen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/njmahonyen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid232115en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2021-0090en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.rssurihttps://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/ijspp/aop/article-10.1123-ijspp.2021-0090/article-10.1123-ijspp.2021-0090.xmlen
dc.status.accessibleNen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record