Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'SULLIVAN, MARIA
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Sara
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Irene
dc.contributor.authorSmuts, Karla
dc.contributor.authorWarters, Austin
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-13T16:19:41Z
dc.date.available2020-03-13T16:19:41Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017en
dc.identifier.citationKelly S, O'Brien I, Smuts K, O'Sullivan M, Warters A., Prevalence of frailty among community dwelling older adults in receipt of low level home support: a cross-sectional analysis of the North Dublin Cohort., BMC Geriatr., 17, 121, 2017, 1 - 11en
dc.identifier.issnhttps://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-017-0508-2
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/91800
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is increasing demand for formal government funded home help services to support community-dwelling older people in Ireland, yet limited information exists on the health profiles of this group, especially regarding frailty. Our aim was to profile a large cohort of adults in receipt of low level home help and to determine the prevalence of frailty. Methods: A total 1312 older adults, (≥ 65 years) in receipt of low level home help (< 5 h per week) were reviewed by community nurses and frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in this cross-sectional study. Characteristics of the group were compared between males and females and prevalence of frailty was reported according to gender and principal care. Associations between frailty and a number of variables were explored using bivariate and regression analysis. Results: The cohort of low level home-help users was a mean age of 82.1 (SD 7.3) years, predominantly female (70.6%) and over half (69.2%) lived alone. The prevalence of frailty in this population was 41.5%, with subjects primarily considered mildly (23.2%) or moderately frail (14.5%) by the CFS. A further 38.4% were classed as vulnerable. The degree of frailty did not differ significantly across the younger categories aged 65–84 years. However, in the oldest age groups, namely 90–94 and >95 years, moderate frailty was significantly higher relative to the younger groups (21% and 34%, p < 0.05, p < 0.01 respectively). Home help hours significantly correlated with frailty (rs = 0.371, p < 0.001) and functional dependency (rs = 0.609, p < 0.001), but only weakly with age (rs = 0.101, p = 0.034). Based on regression analysis, determinants of frailty included greater dependency (Barthel score), higher home help hours, non-self-caring and communication difficulty, all of which significantly contributed to the model, with a r squared value of 0.508. Conclusion: A high prevalence of frailty (41.5%) was documented in this population which associated with higher home help utilisation. Frailty was associated with greater functional dependency, but not strongly with chronological age, until after 90 years. These findings highlight opportunities for developing intervention strategies targeted at ageing in place among home help users.en
dc.format.extent1en
dc.format.extent11en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMC Geriatr.;
dc.relation.ispartofseries17;
dc.relation.ispartofseries121;
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectFrailtyen
dc.subjectHome helpen
dc.subjectDomiciliary careen
dc.subjectAgeingen
dc.subjectClinical frailty scaleen
dc.titlePrevalence of frailty among community dwelling older adults in receipt of low level home support: a cross-sectional analysis of the North Dublin Cohorten
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/mosulli5
dc.identifier.rssinternalid180498
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record